Executive Dashboard

CISO Dashboard

AI Security & Risk Posture Overview

Illustrative scenario — fictional organization, not customer or benchmark data.

All five executive dashboards use the same made-up company so the figures can be compared with each other. None of them is measured from your organization, from PromptFluent customers or from an industry dataset. To work from your own numbers, use the assessment tools.

0–100 · higher means more exposure

Control Coverage
53%
Average implemented across 6 domains
Shadow AI Users
285
↓ 25 from previous month
Incident Readiness
66/100
Average of 4 capabilities

AI Risk Matrix

Current risk exposure by likelihood and impact

Risk Matrix

Likelihood vs Impact Analysis

Negligible (1)Minor (2)Moderate (3)Major (4)Critical (5)
Almost Certain
(5)
1
risk
Likely
(4)
1
risk
1
risk
Possible
(3)
1
risk
2
risks
Unlikely
(2)
1
risk
Rare
(1)
Low (1-5)
Medium (6-11)
High (12-19)
Critical (20-25)

Control Coverage by Domain

Implemented vs. planned vs. required controls

Gap Analysis: Implemented controls average 53% of required, a gap of 47 points. Lowest coverage: Workforce & HR (38%) and Legal & Compliance (42%).

Shadow AI Surface Area Trend

Discovered tools (including approved ones) vs. approved tools, and users of unapproved tools

Trend: Discovered tools peaked in Month 5 at 28; 9 remain unapproved. The approved count grew 1.9x over six months, to the 17 tools in the CIO inventory.

Incident Readiness Breakdown

Capability scores (0–100) across the response lifecycle

Detection
72
Response
65
Recovery
58
Communication
70

Gap: Recovery is the weakest capability at 58/100. Recommend developing AI-specific recovery procedures.

Security Posture Trend

Overall security score and incident count over time

Positive Trend

Security score improved 14 points over six months, to 72

Incident Reduction

No incidents in Month 6, the first incident-free month in the six shown

Goal Target

Target of 85 is about 5 months away at the current pace (2.8 points a month)

Top Security Initiatives

Current progress on critical AI security projects

DLP for AI Tools

CriticalETA: 2 weeks
75%

AI-Specific Incident Response Playbook

HighETA: 3 weeks
60%

Bias Testing Framework

HighETA: 6 weeks
40%

Zero Trust AI Access

MediumETA: 8 weeks
30%

AI Vendor Security Assessments

HighETA: 4 weeks
55%

Critical Actions (Next 7 Days)

  • •Complete DLP deployment for top 5 AI tools
  • •Review and approve 3 pending AI vendor assessments
  • •Execute incident response tabletop exercise

High Priority (Next 30 Days)

  • •Launch AI-specific security awareness training
  • •Implement continuous monitoring for shadow AI
  • •Establish AI security metrics dashboard

Strategic Initiatives (90 Days)

  • •Bring AI tools into scope for the next SOC 2 examination
  • •Implement zero trust architecture for AI
  • •Build AI security center of excellence